The Inside Story Of The Roger Ver Vs. CoinFLEX Battle

The notorious Roger Ver is again within the headlines for all of the flawed causes. Like many gamers within the business, the derivatives trade CoinFLEX lately bumped into monetary hassle. Surprisingly, they blamed all of it on Roger Ver and the circus began. Fortunately for us, Chinese language journalist Colin Wu coated “the whole insider particulars by a supply near the state of affairs” in his e-newsletter. Nevertheless, as you’ll be able to see, it’s an nameless supply. So, take the story we’re about to investigate with a grain of salt. 

The abstract of the state of affairs based on Wu:

“On June 24, 2022, the trade CoinFLEX introduced that it made the choice to halt consumer withdraws, and the worth of the platform Token FLEX subsequently plummeted, from $4.30 to lower than $1.50 in 4 hours. On the identical time, FlexUSD, the platform’s stablecoin, additionally started to de-peg, with costs dropping as little as $0.23.”

The humorous factor is that each entities had been clearly in enterprise collectively. On Might 14th, Roger Ver tweeted, “Curiosity paying FlexUSD by CoinFLEX  is on its approach to being the default steady coin for the entire SmartBCH ecosystem if USDT & USDC don’t transfer rapidly.” How did all the pieces deteriorate so quick? That’s what this text’s about. 

Roger Ver Vs. CoinFLEX, The Play By Play

The story begins with CoinFLEX asserting to their companions that they “opened a particular account for Roger Ver.” The account’s traits assured that Roger Ver “wouldn’t be liquidated instantly if it fell under the upkeep margin, however relatively that he could be given adequate time to make a margin name.” Nothing particular right here, the person is a high-net-worth particular person, offers like this are a dime a dozen in excessive finance. 

As a assure, Roger Ver provided “a margin of BCH,” valued “at round $400.” Then, the Terra collapse occurred and the entire crypto market crashed. By the point CoinFLEX ”confronted a liquidity disaster,” Bitcoin Money was value round $120. It’s nonetheless at that worth vary on the time of writing. That is the place issues get insane. The most important revelation of Wu’s story is on the finish of this paragraph.

“If that had been all, CoinFLEX would have been in a position to cowl its shortfall. Nevertheless, previous to this, CoinFLEX had issued its personal stablecoin, FlexUSD, like different exchanges. At this level, CoinFLEX used FlexUSD to purchase a considerable amount of FLEX from the secondary market and opened quick place to hedge the spot worth. Nevertheless, the counterparty to this quick place was additionally Roger Ver!”

As we’ve seen occur time and again, “when the withdrawal restriction announcement was made, CoinFLEX’s whole funds started to fall in a cyclical trend.” And all hell broke free. 

BCHUSD price chart - TradingView

BCH worth chart on Coinbase | Supply: BCH/USD on

An All-Out Twitter Warfare

On June twenty seventh, the corporate’s CEO Mark Lamb tweeted, “CoinFLEX made the choice to halt consumer withdrawals on June 23, shortly after a long-time buyer of CoinFLEX went into damaging fairness. ” Instantly after, the rumor that Roger Ver was that “long-time buyer” started circulating.

The Bitcoin Money chief went on the offensive and tweeted an announcement clearly written by a lawyer. “Just lately some rumors have been spreading that I’ve defaulted on a debt to a counter-party. These rumors are false. Not solely do I not have a debt to this counter-party, however this counter-party owes me a considerable sum of cash, and I’m at the moment searching for the return of my funds.” How might these two statements be true? Keep in mind that “the counterparty to this quick place was additionally Roger Ver!”

Nevertheless, Mark Lamb was not having it. Although each events had been negotiating, Lamb took to Twitter and said, “CoinFLEX additionally categorically denies that we have now any money owed owing to him.” Plus, “Roger Ver owes CoinFLEX $47 Million USDC. We now have a written contract with him obligating him to personally assure any damaging fairness on his CoinFLEX account and high up margin recurrently.”

Even when CoinFLEX is correct on this occasion, did they need to air their soiled laundry in public?

Roger Ver Vs. CoinFLEX, The Aftermath

Again to Colin Wu’s e-newsletter:

“Ultimately, Roger Ver’s place was fully worn out and was damaging fairness, whereas CoinFLEX was left with a number of delisting FLEX. It was revealed that CoinFLEX had an actual lack of $120 million, together with losses from the de-peg of the stablecoin FlexUSD and the lack of withdrawals (lower than $10 million) as a result of collapse of the SmartBCH cross-chain bridge, which was constructed by CoinFLEX.”

And the very fact of the matter is that, even when Roger Ver’s debt brought about this, CoinFLEX’s danger administration crew has a couple of inquiries to reply. “Roger Ver turned nearly the one counterparty to the trade, and this solely counterparty had the privilege of not replenishing the margin in time,” Wu concludes. It was an unlucky sequence of occasions, however each events signed these offers and each events took to Twitter to resolve what ought to’ve been a non-public matter. 

Disgrace throughout.

Featured Picture by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay | Charts by TradingView

How you can Purchase [The Ultimate Guide 2022]

How A lot Will Biden’s Proposed Federal Fuel Tax Vacation Save Us